![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Republicans block bill to lift military gay ban
Once again, the Republicans prove that they don't give a flying fuck about what's best for the country or about the rights of individuals.
I'm getting really sick and tired of living in a theocracy, :(.
Whether you think that being gay is morally okay or not (though for the record, if you think that it's not, I think you're an asshat), there is overwhelming support for DADT being repealed - 80% of Americans are in favor of it. There is also a TON of evidence proving that it causes no harm to the military and that having this policy in effect makes other countries who allow gays to serve openly not want to serve with our soldiers.
Not to mention that a lack of Arabic translators contributed directly to 9/11. Guess what the specialty was of many of those discharged under DADT?
It's a shitty policy that hurts our country and destroys lives, so of course Republicans are in favor of it.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 09:11 pm (UTC)unfortunately for many Americans, and the rest of the world, the Republicans are still manipulating politics on a scale that is dangerous ...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 09:40 pm (UTC)For all the lurid rumors and self appointed "gayness experts" I never saw once any hint of a problem from someone being LGBTQ.
This entire thing is a massive waste of tax payers' money, federal time, and my patience because they won't let this thing go.
Let's face it. Gays have always been in the military. They always will be in the military. They are not going away. Plato praises the virtues of homosexual soldiers in Symposium, the Hagakure (handbook for Samurai) deals with homosexuality pragmatically and gives practical advice on an affair during wartime. A dear friend of mine came out of the closet after he did a stint in the Navy.
AAAARRRGGHHHH!!! I'm ranting, I know, but I endured years of sly "knowing" looks and not too subtle hints that the "experts" knew I was a lesbian. The joke is on them, because I am the religious right's near ideal, a somewhat asexual vanilla het. I only laughed at how they held their asses fearing penetration coming out of the dark and how they suspected so many.
Gah, I could make a movie satire of their homophobia.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 11:28 pm (UTC)obsessive, that what it is.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 10:35 pm (UTC)The GOP enshrines its bigotry again
no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 10:52 pm (UTC)This is one of those times when I just don't understand humanity. These are men and women who are willing to fight and die for their country, something that most people AREN'T willing to do (me being one of them - I'd fight someone invading who was at my door, but military service is something I've actively avoided), and we shun them because of who they have sex with.
The stupid, it burns.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-21 11:35 pm (UTC)I see what you were trying to say here. However, the thinking that we need to overcome is that GLBTQ persons are somehow different form other soldiers.
ANYONE can be a fierce fighter under the right circumstances, regardless of any other factors, :).
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 01:27 am (UTC)I used to know a (deeply closeted) Combat Controller out at Nellis.
You don't to be one of those unless you're the sort of person who can open up a can of whup-ass any time, any place, anywhere.
It has nothing to do with gay/straight/bi.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 01:01 am (UTC)It's unprofessional.
(Now, there were some different opinions about having sex on ship and fraternizing, but everybody was in agreement on "you don't shit where you eat.")
(And I'll be back with another comment as soon as I get on the ref desk.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 01:19 am (UTC)The military's effort to repress homosexuality embodies this tension between illumination and denial and highlights the failure of American culture to deliver the Enlightenment promise of achieving freedom through self-government. This is where sexuality policy in the military should be played out. True, the strongest argument against the policy is one of national security: We simply can't afford to waste good talent. But it is also one of national greatness: We can't afford to treat the men and women of our armed services like children, to indulge -- with the approval of the military leadership -- their worst instincts and to write repression and denial into federal policy. American service members are not infants who think that when they close their eyes, the world disappears. Operating as if they were doesn't make our country great; it diminishes us.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 02:38 am (UTC)No words.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 02:41 am (UTC)